From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Reynoso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 12, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 506718.

November 12, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Ignacio Reynoso, Comstock, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Kane and Malone Jr., JJ., concur.


Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of engaging in lewd conduct. That determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence, consisting of the eyewitness misbehavior report and confidential testimony heard by the Hearing Officer in camera, supports the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Arnold v Fischer, 60 AD3d 1177, 1177; Matter of Gallo v Fischer, 50 AD3d 1374, 1374). We are unpersuaded by petitioner's contention that he was denied the right to call inmate witnesses to testify, as the requested witnesses executed written refusal forms indicating that they had no knowledge of the alleged incident ( see Matter of Wilson v Goord, 47 AD3d 1102, 1103). We have examined petitioner's remaining claims, including that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance and that the Hearing Officer was biased, and find them to be either unpreserved or without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Reynoso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 12, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Reynoso

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of IGNACIO REYNOSO, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 12, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 1166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 8117
887 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Prack

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the confidential information considered by the Hearing…

Procopio v. Fischer

Petitioner asserts that he received inadequate employee assistance therein but, assuming any inadequacies…