In re Q.J.

Full title: In the MATTER OF Q.J.

Court: Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 16, 2022

383 N.C. 333 (N.C. 2022)

880 S.E.2d 675

Opinion

No. 309A21

12-16-2022

In the MATTER OF Q.J.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Katy Dickinson-Schultz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for respondent-appellant. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by South A. Moore, General Counsel Fellow and James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, for the State-appellee. Disability Rights North Carolina by Lisa Grafstein, Raleigh, Holly Stiles, and Elizabeth Myerholtz, for Disability Rights North Carolina, National Association of Social Workers, Promise Resource Network, and Peer Voice NC, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Katy Dickinson-Schultz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for respondent-appellant.

Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by South A. Moore, General Counsel Fellow and James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, for the State-appellee.

Disability Rights North Carolina by Lisa Grafstein, Raleigh, Holly Stiles, and Elizabeth Myerholtz, for Disability Rights North Carolina, National Association of Social Workers,¹ Promise Resource Network, and Peer Voice NC, amici curiae.

1 This listing includes the North Carolina Chapter of this organization.

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1 For the reasons stated in In re J.R. , ––– N.C. ––––, 2022-NCSC-127, ––– S.E.2d ––––, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Justices HUDSON, MORGAN, and EARLS dissent for the reasons stated in Justice Earls’ dissenting opinion in In re J.R., ––– N.C. ––––, 2022-NCSC-127, ––– .S.E.2d ––––.