From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 20, 2012
MDL No. 2002 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

MDL No. 2002 08-md-2002

12-20-2012

In re: PROCESSED EGG PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ALL DIRECT ACTION PLAINTIFF ACTIONS


ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of the briefing regarding the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Direct Action Plaintiffs' Claims for Damages (Docket Nos. 638, 664-65, 680), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion is DENIED in part with respect to Giant Eagle's claim under Ohio law and the ability of all the Direct Action Plaintiffs to claim the benefit of class action tolling.
2. The motion is GRANTED in part without prejudice with respect to the Direct Action Plaintiffs' fraudulent concealment allegations pertaining to their federal law claims.
3. The Direct Action Plaintiffs may, by no later than January 18, 2013, seek leave to file amended complaints consistent with the terms of the Court's opinion.

BY THE COURT:

______________

GENE E.K. PRATTER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 20, 2012
MDL No. 2002 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

In re Processed Egg Prods. Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:In re: PROCESSED EGG PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

MDL No. 2002 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 20, 2012)

Citing Cases

Safa v. City of Phila.

"To satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b), a complaint may either describe 'the circumstances of the…

Safa v. City of Phila.

"To satisfy the pleading requirements of Rule 9(b), a complaint may either describe 'the circumstances of the…