From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pratt

Supreme Court of California
May 28, 1971
5 Cal.3d 46 (Cal. 1971)

Opinion

Docket No. Crim. 14083.

May 28, 1971.

COUNSEL

Jake W. Pratt, in pro. per., for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASE


OPINION

THE COURT.

We treat the petition in the above-entitled proceeding as an application to recall the remittitur in People v. Pratt, 2 Crim. 9718. The proceeding is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Four, with directions to recall its remittitur, vacate its judgment to the extent it affirms the judgment in Los Angeles County Superior Court case No. 238805, and redetermine petitioner's appeal therein in light of People v. Daniels, 71 Cal.2d 1119 [ 80 Cal.Rptr. 897, 459 P.2d 225], People v. Mutch, 4 Cal.3d 389 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 721, 482 P.2d 633], and People v. Timmons, 4 Cal.3d 411 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 736, 482 P.2d 648]. To facilitate the proper disposition of the appeal we vacate so much of our order in In re Pratt, 66 Cal.2d 154 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 895, 424 P.2d 335], as sets aside petitioner's robbery sentence.

Sullivan, J., did not participate.


Summaries of

In re Pratt

Supreme Court of California
May 28, 1971
5 Cal.3d 46 (Cal. 1971)
Case details for

In re Pratt

Case Details

Full title:In re JAKE W. PRATT on Habeas Corpus

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 28, 1971

Citations

5 Cal.3d 46 (Cal. 1971)
95 Cal. Rptr. 11
484 P.2d 1355

Citing Cases

People v. Greene

(See People v. Bauer (1969) 1 Cal.3d 368, 375-377 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 357, 461 P.2d 637, 37 A.L.R.3d 1398] [cert.…

People v. DeVaney

In cases of multiple convictions subject to the proscription against double punishment, the cases have…