From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Plantica Landscape Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit
May 6, 2008
385 B.R. 800 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion


385 B.R. 800 (9th Cir. BAP 2008) In the Matter of PLANTICA LANDSCAPE CORPORATION, Debtor, Peter J. Cavanagh; et al., Appellants, v. People of The State of California, Appellee. No. 06-56540. United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit May 6, 2008

          Submitted April 22, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2) .

          Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Pappas , Klein , and Brandt , Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding. BAP No. CC-05-01245-PaBK.

          Before GRABER , FISHER , and BERZON , Circuit Judges.

          MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

          Peter J. Cavanagh and Theresea E. Cavanagh appeal pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP" ) affirming the bankruptcy court's order remanding to state court a criminal proceeding in which the Cavanaghs are defendants. We dismiss.

          We lack jurisdiction to review the BAP's decision affirming the bankruptcy court's remand order. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d) , 1452(b) ; see also Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-29 (1995) (concluding that 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d) and 1452(b) bars appellate review of remand orders).

          Appellants' request for judicial notice is denied as moot.

          DISMISSED.


Summaries of

In re Plantica Landscape Corp.

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit
May 6, 2008
385 B.R. 800 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

In re Plantica Landscape Corp.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PLANTICA LANDSCAPE CORPORATION, Debtor, Peter J…

Court:United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 6, 2008

Citations

385 B.R. 800 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

In re Bender

The issue on appeal, in Congrejo's view, was " Whether the bankruptcy court erred in ruling that the statute…

Perry v. Doe (In re Perry)

And this avoidance power is exercisable only by the Trustee, not by Perry. See Houston v. Eiler (In re…