Opinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2) .
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Pappas , Klein , and Brandt , Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding. BAP No. CC-05-01245-PaBK.
Before GRABER , FISHER , and BERZON , Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Peter J. Cavanagh and Theresea E. Cavanagh appeal pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP" ) affirming the bankruptcy court's order remanding to state court a criminal proceeding in which the Cavanaghs are defendants. We dismiss.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BAP's decision affirming the bankruptcy court's remand order. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d) , 1452(b) ; see also Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-29 (1995) (concluding that 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d) and 1452(b) bars appellate review of remand orders).
Appellants' request for judicial notice is denied as moot.
DISMISSED.