From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pirog

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2014
Case No. 13 B 08550 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 13 B 08550

10-15-2014

In re: NANCY PIROG, Debtor.


Chapter 7

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION OF FRANKGECKER, LLC, ATTORNEYS FOR TRUSTEE, FOR ALLOWANCE OF FINAL COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES

TOTAL FEES REQUESTED: $5,270.00
TOTAL FEES REDUCED: $341.50
TOTAL FEES ALLOWED: $4,928.50
TOTAL COSTS REQUESTED: $35.16
TOTAL COSTS REDUCED: $0.00
TOTAL COSTS ALLOWED: $35.16

TOTAL FEES AND COSTS ALLOWED: $4,963.66

The attached time and expense entries have been underlined to reflect disallowance in whole or in part. The basis for each disallowance is reflected by numerical notations that appear on the left of each underlined entry. The numerical notations correspond to the enumerated paragraphs below.

(1) Improper Allocation of Professional Resources

The Court denies the allowance in part of compensation for the following task since a professional with a lower level of skill and experience or a paraprofessional could have performed the task. In re Pettibone, 74 B.R. 293, 303 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) ("Senior partner rates will be paid only for work that warrants the attention of a senior partner. A senior partner who spends time reviewing documents or doing research a beginning associate could do will be paid at a rate of a beginning associate. [Citation omitted]. Similarly, non-legal work performed by a lawyer which could have been performed by less costly non-legal employees should command a lesser rate."); In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 710 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) (same); In re Alberto, 121 B.R. 531, 535 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1990) (determining use of partner appropriate where attendant complex legal issues warrant highly experienced practitioner).

(7) Lumping

The Court may impose a ten percent penalty for "lumping." In re Wildman, 72 B.R. 700, 709 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 1987) ("Applicants may not circumvent the minimum time requirement or any of the requirements of detail by "lumping" a bunch of activities into a single entry, [citation omitted]. Each type of service should be listed with the corresponding specific time allotment.").

(12) Clerical Work Not Compensable

The court disallows the compensation of clerical or stenographic employees of the professional for the performance of routine clerical or administrative activities in the normal course of the professional's business, such as photocopying, secretarial work, or routine filing. Such activities are not in the nature of professional services and must be absorbed by the applicant's firm as an overhead expense. In re Dimas, LLC, 357 B.R. 563, 577 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. 2006) (citing Missouri v. Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274, 288 n. 10 (1989)). See also In re Chellino, 209 B.R. 106, 114 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 1996) (Paralegal, but not "clerk" services entitled to compensation at an hourly rate; clerk activities are overhead of the professional); Souza v. Miguel, 32 F.3d 1370, 1375 (9th Cir. 1994) (Trustee not entitled to reimbursement or compensation of overhead expenses such as secretarial, stenographic, clerical, and routine messenger services). Dated: October 15, 2014

/s/__________

Eugene R. Wedoff

United States Bankruptcy Judge

Asset Investigation

Hours

Amount

4/2/2014

Review Debtor's schedules regarding Barclay's account (.20);

communications with Z. Zielinski regarding same (.20).

Micah R. Krohn

0.40

$430.00

$172.00

4/3/2014

Outline research regarding Barclays Bank in connection with issuance of

subpoena.

Micah R. Krohn

0.70

$430.00

$301.00

4/3/2014

Communications with Barclays employee Bill Divine in connection with

issuance of subpoena to Barclays Bank.

Micah R. Krohn

0.20

$430.00

$86.00

4/3/2014

Communications with Barclays employee Justin Harrington in connection

with issuance of subpoena to Barclays Bank.

Micah R. Krohn

0.20

$430.00

$86.00

4/3/2014

Draft two document subpoenas (and cover letters) to B arclays Capital,

Inc. and Barclays Bank Delaware.

Micah R. Krohn

1.30

$375.00

$559.00

-71.50

4/9/2014

Communications with litigation manager of Barclays Capital regarding

subpoena.

Micah R. Krohn

0.30

$430.00

$129.00

4/24/2014

Communications with J. Harrington regarding Barclays production in

response to subpoena.

Micah R. Krohn

0.20

$430.00

$86.00

4/24/2014

Review Barclays document production.

Micah R. Krohn

1.20

$375.00

$516.00

-66.00

4/24/2014

Review schedules and related documents (.7); confer with M. Stein

regarding plan of recovery (.3).

Zane L. Zielinski

1.00

$375.00

$375.00



Hours

Amount

4/25/2014

Teleconference with V. Machcinski regarding turnover of assets in

Debtor's Barclays account.

Micah R. Krohn

0,30

$430.00

$129.00

4/25/2014

Draft demand letter to V. Machcinski regarding turnover of assets in

Debtor's Barclays account.

Micah R. Krohn

1.00

$375.00

$430.00

-55.00

5/5/2014

Communications with V. Machcinski regarding turnover of funds in

Barclays account and IRS lien asserted against same.

Micah R. Krohn

0.50

$430.00

$215.00

5/6/2014

Communications with V. Machcinski regarding IRS lien and motion for

turnover and accounting of Barclays account.

Micah R. Krohn

0.40

$430.00

$172.00

5/7/2014

Communications with V. Machcinski regarding contact information in

connection with IRS lien asserted on Barclays account.

Micah R. Krohn

0.20

$430.00

$86.00

5/7/2014

Draft turnover motion and order regarding Barclays account.

Micah R. Krohn

1.80

$375.00

$774.00

-99.01

5/20/2014

Draft letter to V. Machcinski regarding entry of Turnover Order.

Micah R. Krohn

0.30

$430.00

$129.00

6/2/2014

Communications with V. Machcinski regarding liquidation of Barclays

account.

Micah R. Krohn

0.50

$430.00

$215.00

6/3/2014

Review Barclays payment and draft letter to trustee related to open issues.

Zane L. Zielinski

0.40

$375.00

$150.00

-15.01

Total Charges This Matter

10.90

$4,610.00



Fee and Retention Applications

Hours

Amount

5/5/2014

Draft and revise motion to employ FrankGecker, Trustee's counsel,

affidavit of Frances Gecker and proposed order (.70); file and serve same

(.20).

Christina S. Smith

0.90

$175.00

$157.50

5/6/2014

Review and revise motion to retain.

Zane L. Zielinski

0.20

$375.00

$75.00

9/16/2014

Review and revise fee detail.

Christina S. Smith

0.30

$175.00

$52.50

Total Charges This Matter

1.40

$285.00




Summaries of

In re Pirog

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Oct 15, 2014
Case No. 13 B 08550 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2014)
Case details for

In re Pirog

Case Details

Full title:In re: NANCY PIROG, Debtor.

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Oct 15, 2014

Citations

Case No. 13 B 08550 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Oct. 15, 2014)