From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Petition Santiago

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 23, 1969
107 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

Argued October 14, 1969 —

Decided October 23, 1969.

Before Judges KILKENNY, LABRECQUE and LEONARD.

On appeal from Superior Court, Law Division, Hudson County. Reported at 104 N.J. Super. 110 ( Law. Div. 1968).

Mr. William Goldberg argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Alan C. Antonucci and John J. Powers, Directors, Hudson County Legal Services, attorneys). Mr. Abel Goldstein, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. James A. Tumulty, Jr., Hudson County Prosecutor, attorney; Messrs. Anthony M. DeFino and Charles D. Sapienza, on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Artaserse in his opinion as reported in 104 N.J. Super. 110 ( Law Div. 1968).


Summaries of

In re Petition Santiago

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 23, 1969
107 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

In re Petition Santiago

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF CARLOS SANTIAGO, ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHER…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 23, 1969

Citations

107 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 1969)
258 A.2d 31

Citing Cases

State v. Owczarski

R. 3:22 permits any person convicted of a crime to file a petition for post-conviction relief. That rule is…

Romano v. State of New Jersey

Furthermore, applications on behalf of those previously convicted are in the nature of motions for…