From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Perwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 7, 1972
287 A.2d 3 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued January 11, 1972 —

Decided February 7, 1972.

Mr. Frederick C. Vonhof, for the order.

Mr. Stanley J. Perwin, pro se.


The respondent was convicted of criminal offenses in connection with a conspiracy to defraud an insurance carrier. The convictions were affirmed by the Appellate Division, State v. Yormark, 117 N.J. Super. 313 (1971), and we have denied certification. 60 N.J. 138 (1972).

The misconduct requires an order of disbarment, and it is so ordered.

At the oral argument respondent stated that he intended promptly to seek further review of the convictions in other tribunals. Should he prevail in those efforts, he may apply to us for reconsideration of this order.

For disbarment — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

In re Perwin

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 7, 1972
287 A.2d 3 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

In re Perwin

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF STANLEY J. PERWIN, AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 7, 1972

Citations

287 A.2d 3 (N.J. 1972)
287 A.2d 3

Citing Cases

Matter of Zauber

Cases involving criminal conspiracy to defraud have uniformly resulted in disbarment. In re Perwin, 60 N.J.…

Matter of Surgent

Convictions of New Jersey attorneys on charges of insurance fraud and conspiracy to commit insurance fraud…