From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Peric

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2004
5 A.D.3d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3029.

Decided March 4, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered October 30, 2003, which denied petitioner's application to annul respondent Police Department's denial of petitioner's application for a rifle/shotgun permit, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Bert H. Nisonoff, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Dona B. Morris, for Respondent-Respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.


The permit was properly denied on the basis of the circumstances surrounding petitioner's prior arrest for assault (38 RCNY 3-03[a]). That the charges against petitioner were adjourned in contemplation of dismissal and eventually dismissed does not disqualify the circumstances surrounding the arrest from consideration ( see Matter of Abramowitz v. Safir, 293 A.D.2d 352; Matter of Servedio v. Bratton, 268 A.D.2d 356).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Peric

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 2004
5 A.D.3d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

In re Peric

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MUJO PERIC, Petitioner-Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY POLICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 2004

Citations

5 A.D.3d 142 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
772 N.Y.S.2d 507

Citing Cases

Ward v. The New York Police Dep't. Headquarters License Div.

Although petitioner's failure to demonstrate "proper cause" may no longer serve as an appropriate ground for…

In re Application of Flannery v. Prasso

Ostrowski v. City of New York, 55 A.D.3d 471 (1st Dept 2008) (petitioner's arrests and violations of orders…