From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Pennsylvania Company

U.S.
Dec 22, 1890
137 U.S. 457 (1890)

Opinion

On petition for mandamus to the judges of the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut, to take jurisdiction of the suit of Samuel A. Herman against the petitioner.

No. 6, Original.

Argued December 8, 1890. Decided December 22, 1890.

Mr. Daniel Davenport and Mr. William H. O'Hara for the petitioner.

Mr. Lewis E. Stanton opposing.


This case in all material respects is identical with the case of Ex parte The Pennsylvania Company, just decided, and the same conclusion is reached as in that case. The petition for mandamus is

Denied.


Summaries of

In re Pennsylvania Company

U.S.
Dec 22, 1890
137 U.S. 457 (1890)
Case details for

In re Pennsylvania Company

Case Details

Full title:In re PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY, Petitioner

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 22, 1890

Citations

137 U.S. 457 (1890)

Citing Cases

Walcott v. Watson

Short v. Railroad Co., 33 F. 114, and 34 F. 225; Malone v. Railroad Co., 35 F. 625; Southworth v. Reid, 36 F.…

Mining Company v. Towboat Company

From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Messrs. Nathans Sinkler, for appellant, cite: The C.C.of U.S.…