From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Patrick v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2003
309 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1793

October 9, 2003.

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority, dated September 21, 2001, terminating petitioner's public housing tenancy for violation of a stipulation of permanent exclusion, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Saralee Evans, J.], entered August 19, 2002), dismissed, without costs.

Kathleen Brennan, for petitioner.

Steven J. Rappaport, for respondents.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Rosenberger, Williams, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


The finding that petitioner violated the 1988 stipulation of permanent exclusion is supported by substantial evidence that she knowingly permitted her son to visit her in the apartment on at least one occasion (see Matter of Romero v. Martinez, 280 A.D.2d 58, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 721). The penalty of termination does not shock our sense of fairness (see Matter of Featherstone v. Franco, 95 N.Y.2d 550, 554-555), given additional substantial evidence that she knowingly permitted an unauthorized person to take up residence in the apartment, and that her son and the unauthorized resident used the apartment to commit drug-related crimes. Petitioner's other arguments are improperly raised for the first time on appeal, and, in any event, are unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Patrick v. Hernandez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 9, 2003
309 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Patrick v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:IN RE YVONNE PATRICK, Petitioner, v. TINO HERNANDEZ, ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 9, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 566 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 508

Citing Cases

Lettsome v. New York City Hous. Auth.

Sanctions must be upheld unless it shocks the judicial conscience (see Featherstone v. Franco, 95 N.Y.2d 550,…

Dubor Assocs. v. Richburg

In our view, strict enforcement of the stipulation is not warranted on the facts of this case. As to the one…