From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Palmer

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Feb 17, 2005
No. 01-05-00087-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 17, 2005)

Opinion

No. 01-05-00087-CR

Opinion issued February 17, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

Panel consists of Justices TAFT, KEYES, and HANKS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Relator, Donald Gray Palmer, filed a petition for writ of mandamus stating that he filed a timely notice of appeal from his felony conviction in cause number 9402615 that was "denied" by the trial court in January 1995 and not properly processed. Relator requests that this Court order respondent to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Although mandamus is not an equitable remedy, its issuance is largely controlled by equitable principles. In re Little, 998 S.W.2d 287, 289 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding). One such principle is that "[e]quity aids the diligent and not those who slumber on their rights." Little, 998 S.W.2d at 289-90 (quoting Rivercenter Assoc. v. Rivera, 858 S.W.2d 366, 367 (Tex. 1993)). Relator's claims all stem from events that allegedly occurred more than 10 years ago. Mandamus relief is barred by laches. We note that the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure provides for post-conviction habeas corpus relief. See Board of Pardons Paroles ex rel. Keene v. Court of Appeals for the Eighth District, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex.Crim.App. 1995); Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon Supp. 2004-2005). The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. It is so ORDERED.

Respondent is the Honorable Debbie Mantooth Stricklin, Judge, 180th District Court, Harris County.


Summaries of

In re Palmer

Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston
Feb 17, 2005
No. 01-05-00087-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 17, 2005)
Case details for

In re Palmer

Case Details

Full title:IN RE DONALD GRAY PALMER, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston

Date published: Feb 17, 2005

Citations

No. 01-05-00087-CR (Tex. App. Feb. 17, 2005)

Citing Cases

In re Jones

Mandamus is not an equitable remedy, but "its issuance is largely controlled by equitable principles." In …