From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ovitt

Supreme Court of Vermont
Apr 4, 1967
229 A.2d 243 (Vt. 1967)

Opinion

Opinion Filed April 4, 1967

Criminal Law.

1. 13 V.S.A. § 7131, cannot do service as an appeal.

2. Petition to vacate sentence was properly dismissed, where appeal from conviction was pending, and all issues presented by petition were available on direct review. 13 V.S.A. § 7131.

Motion to vacate sentence with respect to conviction for rape. The motion was brought while appeal of conviction was pending. Essex County Court, Sylvester, J., presiding. Motion denied because of pending appeal reported at 126 Vt. 320, 229 A.2d 237. Affirmed.

Herbert E. Ovitt, pro se. Chester S. Ketcham, Special Counsel for Attorney General, for the State.

February Term, 1967

Present: Holden, C.J., Shangraw, Barney, Smith and Keyser, JJ.


While the appeal in State of Vermont v. Herbert E. Ovitt, No. 491, was pending, the respondent appellant presented a motion to vacate his sentence. The motion was brought under the provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 7131 (1966, No. 41 § 1a). It attacks the validity of the information, claiming the Deputy Attorney General was without lawful authority to institute the prosecution. This point is considered in the appeal from his conviction.

The Essex County Court denied the motion because of the pending appeal, ruling that all of the issues presented were available on direct review by this Court. The statute, upon which the petitioner acted, cannot do service as an appeal. The order dismissing the petition is well founded. In re Rickert, 124 Vt. 232, 235, 203 A.2d 602.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

In re Ovitt

Supreme Court of Vermont
Apr 4, 1967
229 A.2d 243 (Vt. 1967)
Case details for

In re Ovitt

Case Details

Full title:In re Herbert E. Ovitt

Court:Supreme Court of Vermont

Date published: Apr 4, 1967

Citations

229 A.2d 243 (Vt. 1967)
229 A.2d 243

Citing Cases

In re Woodmansee

In re Woodmansee, 124 Vt. 219, 220, 202 A.2d 267; In re Comolli, 78 Vt. 337, 343, 63 A. 184. Furthermore,…

Berard v. Moeykens

This he cannot do. Neither habeas corpus nor post-conviction review is a substitute for appeal. In re Ovitt,…