From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 2010
71 A.D.3d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 506415.

March 11, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Stacy L. Graczyk, Prisoners' Legal Services, Plattsburgh, for petitioner.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed and all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record. Accordingly, as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, this matter is dismissed as moot ( see Matter of Hart v Fischer, 60 AD3d 1226). Regarding petitioner's request for an award of counsel fees and other expenses pursuant to CPLR article 86, such an application must be made in the court of original instance ( see Matter of McCrimmon v Dowling, 229 AD2d 1029, 1030; Matter of Sutherland v Glennon, 224 AD2d 819) and comply with the procedural requirements of CPLR 8601 (b).

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 2010
71 A.D.3d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HAROLD ORTIZ, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 11, 2010

Citations

71 A.D.3d 1244 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 1857
894 N.Y.S.2d 924

Citing Cases

Nigro v. Fischer

The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination was administratively reversed on May 7,…

Mercado v. Annucci

To the extent that petitioner seeks to be restored to the housing status and location that he enjoyed prior…