From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Orpheus Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1365 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 507932.

May 20, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Orpheus Nelson, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Sania W. Kahn of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ.


Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with conspiring to smuggle and possess drugs, as well as violating facility visitation procedures. After a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged. His administrative appeal resulted in a modified penalty and, thereafter, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Initially, inasmuch as the misbehavior report was issued in the wake of an ongoing investigation, it was tendered in a timely manner ( see 7 NYCRR 251-3.1 [a]; Matter of Decastro v Prack, 62 AD3d 1224, 1225; Matter of Schultz v Goord, 301 AD2d 764, 764-765). Next, we find that petitioner received adequate employee assistance, as the assistant was apparently asked only to interview witnesses who were identified in confidential documents and later refused to testify, and to obtain documents that were either confidential or nonexistent ( see Matter of Jimenez v Fischer, 56 AD3d 924, 925; Matter of Tusa v Goord, 287 AD2d 907, 908, appeal dismissed, 98 NY2d 646). Finally, the misbehavior report and testimony of the investigator who prepared it, as well as confidential testimony and documentary evidence, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt ( see Matter of Johnson v Goord, 7 AD3d 863, 863-864; Matter of Kayshawn v Selsky, 277 AD2d 611, 611). Petitioner's remaining contentions, to the extent they are properly before us, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Orpheus Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 20, 2010
73 A.D.3d 1365 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re Orpheus Nelson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ORPHEUS NELSON, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 20, 2010

Citations

73 A.D.3d 1365 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 4304
900 N.Y.S.2d 692

Citing Cases

In re Deshawn Smart

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the investigator who prepared it, as well…