From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
CASE NO. 3:10-md-2143 RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10-md-2143 RS

03-18-2013

IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION


ORDER RE OBJECTION TO

NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER

OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendant Toshiba Samsung Storage Technology Korea Corporation ("TSSTK") seeks relief from an order of the assigned magistrate judge, made in open court but not yet reduced to writing, compelling the production by March 15, 2013 of certain documents located overseas. TSSTK contends that the production should be stayed for a minimum of four months, to preclude the Department of Justice obtaining documents for use in a criminal investigation that ordinarily would be beyond the scope of its criminal subpoena power. While TSSTK acknowledges Ninth Circuit authority suggesting there are no legal restrictions on the government's ability to act in precisely such a manner, it argues the civil production should be delayed in this case to prevent unfairness.

TSSTK asserts it only learned of the Department of Justice's intentions after the magistrate judge's ruling, and there is no indication the issue was otherwise presented to him for consideration in the first instance. Accordingly, TSSTK's present objection made to this Court is overruled, without prejudice to it seeking relief from the magistrate judge. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

RICHARD SEEBORG

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Mar 18, 2013
CASE NO. 3:10-md-2143 RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)
Case details for

In re Optical Disk Drive Antitrust Litigation

Case Details

Full title:IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Mar 18, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10-md-2143 RS (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2013)