From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re O'Keefe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 14, 1996
233 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

November 14, 1996.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Before: Mikoll, J.P., Mercure, Crew III, White and Casey, JJ.


In September 1994, petitioner was in the custody of the State Police when he escaped from the back seat of a police cruiser and absconded, eluding capture for several days. In February 1995, petitioner was incarcerated at Attica Correctional Facility in Wyoming County, assigned to the administrative segregation unit. An administrative hearing resulted in a decision rejecting petitioner's contention that he should be released from administrative segregation and housed with the general inmate population. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

A determination confining an inmate to administrative segregation must be supported by substantial evidence showing that his "presence in [the] general population would pose a threat to the safety and security of the facility" ( 7 NYCRR 301.4 [b]). We find that substantial evidence supports the determination here. Petitioner's history of escape is a matter of public record. In addition, evidence was presented at the administrative hearing by a confidential informant stating that petitioner was formulating plans for another escape attempt. There was, accordingly, substantial evidence that petitioner posed a threat to the safety and security of the facility, thereby justifying the determination that his assignment to administrative segregation was appropriate ( see, Matter of Blake v Mann, 75 NY2d 742, 743, affg 145 AD2d 699; Matter of Scott v Coombe, 228 AD2d 996, 998). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions and find them to be either without merit or unpreserved for our review.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re O'Keefe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 14, 1996
233 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re O'Keefe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOEL O'KEEFE, Petitioner, v. PHILLIP COOMBE, JR., as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 14, 1996

Citations

233 A.D.2d 640 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
650 N.Y.S.2d 47

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Selsky

After the determination was upheld by respondent on administrative appeal, this CPLR article 78 proceeding…

Matter of Smith v. Goord

That determination was affirmed upon administrative review and is now challenged in this CPLR article 78…