From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re of Bacik v. Great Neck Water Pollution

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 2006
29 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-04897.

May 2, 2006.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Great Neck Water Pollution Control District dated April 20, 2004, which, after a hearing, adopted a Hearing Officer's recommendation that the petitioner's employment be terminated.

Louis D. Stober, Jr., LLC, Garden City, N.Y. (Anthony P. Giustino of counsel), for appellant.

Grotta, Glassman, Hoffman, P.C., New York, N.Y. (David M. Wirtz and Donia Sawwan of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Miller, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits.

"It is well settled that judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body after a hearing is limited to whether that determination is supported by substantial evidence upon the entire record" ( Matter of Liuzzo v. State of N.Y. Dept. of Motor Vehs. Appeals Bd., 209 AD2d 618; see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 180). "Substantial evidence `means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact'" ( Matter of Boyd v. Constantine, 81 NY2d 189, 196, quoting 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, supra at 180). In addition, the decision of a Hearing Officer to credit the testimony of witnesses is "largely unreviewable by the courts, who are disadvantaged in such matters because their review is confined to a lifeless record" ( Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443; Matter of Hall v. Del Castillo, 174 AD2d 743).

The determination under review is supported by substantial evidence. The imposed penalty of dismissal is not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness ( see Matter of Boyd v. Constantine, supra at 196; Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 NY2d 222, 233).

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

In re of Bacik v. Great Neck Water Pollution

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 2, 2006
29 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

In re of Bacik v. Great Neck Water Pollution

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JOSEPH BACIK, Petitioner, v. GREAT NECK WATER POLLUTION…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 2, 2006

Citations

29 A.D.3d 573 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 3577
815 N.Y.S.2d 118

Citing Cases

Harper v. W.E. Rest

1, 760-1304.2, and 760-307.3 (b) must be annulled and the penalties imposed on those violations in the total…

Friedenthal v. Macerich Queens Expansion, LLC

that it neither created the hazardous condition nor had actual or constructive notice of its existence for a…