From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division.
Dec 24, 1996
170 F.R.D. 153 (E.D. Tex. 1996)

Opinion

          Class action was brought against manufacturers of contraceptive implants in which products liability claims were asserted. Defendants moved to compel production of discovery materials, and the District Court, Schell, Chief Judge, held that manufacturers were entitled to discovery of Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Social Security, and employment records for five " bellwether" plaintiffs for period beginning ten years before date of plaintiffs' contraceptive insertions until the present.

         Motion granted.

         Income tax returns are not absolutely privileged from discovery.

          Chris Parks of Parker and Parks, Port Arthur, TX, Roger Brosnahan of Brosnahan, Joseph & Suggs, Minneapolis, MN, and Turner Branch, Branch Law Firm, Alberquerque, NM, for Plaintiffs.

          John W. Vardaman, F. Lane Heard III, Steve Farina of Willams & Connolly, Washington DC, and Paul W. Gertz, Larry Germer, Tonya Connell Adams of Germer & Gertz, Beaumont, TX, for Defendants.


          ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF IRS AND SOCIAL SECURITY RECORDS

          SCHELL, Chief Judge.

         This matter is before the court on Defendants' Motion to Compel Production of IRS and Social Security Records and Employment Records, filed on December 6, 1996. Plaintiffs filed a response on December 19, 1996. Upon consideration of Defendants' motion, the memorandum in support of the motion, Plaintiffs' response, and applicable law, the court is of the opinion that Defendants' motion should be GRANTED.

          Although none of the 5 bellwether plaintiffs are making claims for lost wages, Defendants seek independent verification of Plaintiffs' employment history. The court is mindful of the fact that Plaintiffs have provided employment information through interrogatory answers, depositions, and document requests for employment records. Nevertheless, in some instances, these answers and produced documents have left some gaps in the employment history of one or more of the 5 bellwether plaintiffs. Therefore, given the importance of these bellwether trials; the fact that tax returns are not absolutely privileged; the fact that any additional employers or employment periods revealed by these IRS and Social Security records may lead to relevant information regarding the Plaintiffs' daily work activities, performance, and attendance; the fact that production of the Plaintiffs' IRS and Social Security records will not be burdensome inasmuch as Plaintiffs' counsel are already in possession of such records; and the court's general philosophy that both sides should fully disclose all relevant information, Defendants' motion is GRANTED.

The 5 bellwether plaintiffs are Jennifer Burton, Theresa Goins, Andrea Haught, Beverly McDaniel, and Kristy Youngblood.

FDIC v. LeGrand, 43 F.3d 163, 172 (5th Cir.1995) (recognizing the following two-part test in determining whether tax returns should be produced: (1) the party seeking production of the documents must show their relevance to the inquiry; and (2) then, the burden shifts to the party opposing production to show that other sources exist from which the information contained in the income tax returns may be readily obtained); see United States v. Bonanno, 119 F.R.D. 625, 627 (E.D.N.Y.1988).

         Therefore, the 5 bellwether plaintiffs shall produce the IRS and Social Security records for the period beginning ten (10) years before the date of their first Norplant insertion until the present. The court will consider Defendants' request to be granted leave to secure any previously unproduced employment records which may be discovered after production of the IRS and Social Security records upon appropriate motion and as future circumstances dictate.


Summaries of

In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division.
Dec 24, 1996
170 F.R.D. 153 (E.D. Tex. 1996)
Case details for

In re Norplant Contraceptive Products Liability Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division.

Date published: Dec 24, 1996

Citations

170 F.R.D. 153 (E.D. Tex. 1996)