From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Norman E. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 2011
83 A.D.3d 1401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. CAF 10-00365.

April 1, 2011.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Rosalie Bailey, J.), entered October 7, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded sole custody of the parties' child to petitioner Norman E. Green and visitation to respondent Jacqueline Bontzolakes.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

CHARLES J. GREENBERG, BUFFALO, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT AND PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

NORMAN E. GREEN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT AND RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.

MARY ANNE CONNELL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, BUFFALO, FOR NYDAYA G.

Present — Smith, J.P., Peradotto, Lindley, Sconiers and Martoche, JJ.


It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

The mother of the child at issue, the respondent in proceeding Nos. 1 and 3 and the petitioner in proceeding No. 2, appeals from an order that, following a hearing, granted the petitions in proceeding Nos. 1 and 3. The father, by those petitions, alleged that the mother violated the provisions of a prior order of custody and visitation and sought to modify that order by awarding him sole custody of the parties' daughter and granting visitation to the mother. Family Court also denied the mother's petition in proceeding No. 2 seeking modification of the visitation provisions of the prior order. Contrary to the mother's contention, the court properly awarded the father sole custody of the child ( see Matter of Dubuque v Bremiller, 79 AD3d 1743). "`Generally, a court's determination regarding custody and visitation issues, based upon a first-hand assessment of the credibility of the witnesses after an evidentiary hearing, is entitled to great weight and will not be set aside unless it lacks an evidentiary basis in the record `"( id. at 1744). We see no basis to disturb the court's determination.

We have considered the mother's remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit.


Summaries of

In re Norman E. Green

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 1, 2011
83 A.D.3d 1401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Norman E. Green

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of NORMAN E. GREEN, Respondent, v. JACQUELINE BONTZOLAKES…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 1, 2011

Citations

83 A.D.3d 1401 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2559
919 N.Y.S.2d 451

Citing Cases

Onondaga Cnty. Dep't of Children & Family Servs. v. Stephanie H. (In re Nevin H.)

We reject the mother's further contention in appeal No. 2 that the court erred in awarding custody of the…

Marino v. Marino

, 210, 582 N.Y.S.2d 863). No one factor is determinative because the court must review the totality of the…