From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Nielsen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Mar 1, 2001
768 A.2d 41 (D.C. 2001)

Opinion

No. 00-BG-1464

Decided March 1, 2001

On Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility.

Before Ruiz and Glickman, Associate Judges, and Nebeker, Senior Judge.


The Board on Professional Responsibility ("Board") has concluded that respondent, Kenneth E. Nielsen, Jr., violated Rule 8.4 (d) (conduct that seriously interferes with the administration of justice) of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2 (b)(3) by failing to respond in a timely fashion to Bar Counsel's requests for, and the Board's order to file, a response to an ethical complaint. The Board recommends that respondent be publicly censured for his misconduct.

Neither Bar Counsel nor respondent has filed an exception to the Board's report and recommendation, which increases this court's already substantial deference to the Board. See D.C. Bar R. XI, § 9 (g)(2). The Board's findings are supported by the record, and the sanction it recommends is appropriate. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Kenneth E. Nielsen, Jr., be and hereby is publicly censured.

So ordered.


Summaries of

In re Nielsen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Mar 1, 2001
768 A.2d 41 (D.C. 2001)
Case details for

In re Nielsen

Case Details

Full title:In re Kenneth E. Nielsen, Jr., Respondent. A Member of the Bar of the…

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 1, 2001

Citations

768 A.2d 41 (D.C. 2001)

Citing Cases

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nielsen

This cause is pending before the Supreme Court of Ohio in accordance with the reciprocal discipline…

In re Mabry

The Board concluded that the record and existing caselaw did not support the hearing committee's recommended…