From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mtr. of Tamaine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 2007
38 A.D.3d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

Nos. 2005-10125, 2005-10127, B-76-05, B-77-05.

March 20, 2007.

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate the mother's parental rights on the ground of mental illness, the mother appeals from two orders of factfinding and disposition (one as to each child) of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), both dated September 27, 2005, which, after a factfinding hearing, inter alia, terminated her parental rights and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York and Little Flower Children's Services for purposes of adoption.

Pauline E. Braun, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Carrieri Carrieri, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Ralph R. Carrieri of counsel), for respondent.

Steven R. Banks (Tamara Steckler and LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene MacRae, LLP, New York, N.Y. [Carol A. Lafond] of counsel), Law Guardian for the children.

Before: Crane, J.P., Florio, Fisher and Dickerson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner agency established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother, presently and for the foreseeable future, will be unable, by reason of mental illness, to provide proper and adequate care for her children ( see Social Services Law § 384-b [c]; Matter of Michael W, 15 AD3d 670, 670-671). After interviewing the mother and reviewing her medical records and case history, the court-appointed clinical psychologist testified that the mother suffers from "psychotic disorder NOS," i.e., a psychotic disorder "not otherwise specified." The psychologist opined that, if returned to the mother, the children would be at risk of being neglected in the present and foreseeable future, because of the mother's mental illness, her lack of insight about it, and her refusal to seek treatment. This evidence supported the Family Court's determination ( see Matter of Dederia S.C, 26 AD3d 375; Matter of Karyn Katrina D., 19 AD3d 592; Matter of Julia P., 8 AD3d 389).


Summaries of

In re Mtr. of Tamaine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 20, 2007
38 A.D.3d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Mtr. of Tamaine

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of TAMAINE WILLIAM B., Also Known as TAMAINE B., Also Known…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2007

Citations

38 A.D.3d 767 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
38 A.D.3d 768
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2549
832 N.Y.S.2d 622

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Dileina M.F. (anonymous).Mercyfirst

The psychologist also testified that the mother's insight into her mental illness was poor, and that her…

IN RE MATTER OF DILEINA M. F. v. ROSA F.

The psychologist also testified that the mother's insight into her mental illness was poor, and that her…