From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Mtr. of Cortorreal v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 99741.

January 4, 2007.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McCarthy, J), entered October 20, 2005 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents' motion to dismiss the petition.

Rafael Cortorreal, Wallkill, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank K. Walsh of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Crew III, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Rose, JJ.


The visitation privileges of petitioner's mother and sister were revoked as a result of their involvement in supplying petitioner, a prison inmate, with a cell phone. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the revocation. Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding for lack of standing and this appeal ensued.

We affirm. Petitioner does not have standing based upon his mother's and sister's loss of visitation privileges with him because it is their ability to visit, rather than his ability to receive visitors, that is restricted ( see Matter of Grigger v Goord, 27 AD3d 803, 804, lv denied 7 NY3d 702; Matter of Eulo v Walker, 211 AD2d 547 [2000]; Matter of Gomez v Hollis, 277 AD2d 551, 552).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Mtr. of Cortorreal v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 4, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Mtr. of Cortorreal v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of RAFAEL CORTORREAL, Appellant, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 4, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 1005 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 38
825 N.Y.S.2d 846

Citing Cases

Schleede v. Rabsatt

rt, together with the testimony of the correction officials involved in the investigation, as well as the…

In re David Carter

We affirm. With regard to petitioner's request for restoration of his wife's visiting privileges, it is well…