From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Michelle Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 19, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 510401.

May 19, 2011.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 15, 2010, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Michelle Washington, Buffalo, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ.


Claimant worked as a part-time cleaner for the employer for approximately three years, until her employment was terminated in April 2009 when her supervisor discovered her exiting the cafeteria with a drink in her hand during a non-break period. Claimant applied for unemployment insurance benefits and, ultimately, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board denied benefits on the ground that she lost her employment through misconduct. Claimant now appeals.

We affirm. A knowing violation of an employer's established policies and procedures has been held to constitute disqualifying misconduct ( see Matter of Garrett [Commissioner of Labor], 67 AD3d 1160, 1161; Matter of Kridel [Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 465, 466). Here, claimant admitted at the hearing that she was found in an unauthorized area when she was not on break, and the record demonstrated that claimant had received three prior written warnings regarding similar behavior. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the Board's decision, inasmuch as it is supported by substantial evidence.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Michelle Washington

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 19, 2011
84 A.D.3d 1603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

In re Michelle Washington

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of MICHELLE WASHINGTON, Appellant. COMMISSIONER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 19, 2011

Citations

84 A.D.3d 1603 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 4131
922 N.Y.S.2d 821

Citing Cases

Osborne v. Brockport Auxiliary Servs.

Claimant appeals. We affirm. “A knowing violation of an employer's established policy or reasonable request…

In the Matter of the Claim of Madison L. Cheek

We affirm. An employee's knowing violation of an employer's established policies and procedures, which has a…