From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Michals

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 27, 2015
224 N.J. 457 (N.J. 2015)

Opinion

02-27-2015

In the Matter of Spiro T. MICHALS, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 002811991).


ORDER

This matter have been duly presented pursuant to Rule 1:20–10(b), following a granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 14–348 of SPIRO T. MICHALS of RED BANK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991;

And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21–6 (recordkeeping violations);

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct violated RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21–6, and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or lesser discipline;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. XIV–2013–0383E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20–16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SPIRO T. MICHALS of RED BANK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Michals

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 27, 2015
224 N.J. 457 (N.J. 2015)
Case details for

In re Michals

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Spiro T. MICHALS, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Feb 27, 2015

Citations

224 N.J. 457 (N.J. 2015)
134 A.3d 956

Citing Cases

In re Zuvich

Even in the absence of a negligent misappropriation, a reprimand may be imposed if the attorney failed to…

In re Wittenberg

Second, the Board has imposed discipline ranging from an admonition to a censure solely for recordkeeping…