From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Michael R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2003
309 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

1830, 1830A

October 14, 2003.

Order of fact-finding and disposition, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered on or about December 14, 2000, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, determined, in child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, that respondent Victor T., a person legally responsible for the welfare of the subject children, had neglected said children, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Susan Clement, for Michael R. and Another.

John J. Marafino, for respondent-appellant.

Alan Beckoff, for petitioner-respondent.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Respondent's neglect of the subject children was established by evidence showing that he stored heroin, which he intended to sell, in the family home and thus failed to exercise "a minimum degree of care" in his assumed role as a parental figure to properly supervise the children and act as their guardian (see Family Court Act § 1012[f]; Matter of Joey T., 185 A.D.2d 851). Evidence at the fact-finding hearing established that respondent had hidden bundles of heroin in the children's hamper; that he packaged narcotics in the presence of one of the children, age nine; that he sold drugs from the family home to strangers; and that his drug-related activities in the home had led to his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. Respondent's conduct, placing the children in near proximity to accessible narcotics and to the very dangerous activity of narcotics trafficking, posed an imminent danger to the children's physical, mental and emotional well-being.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

In re Michael R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 14, 2003
309 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

In re Michael R.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MICHAEL R. AND ANOTHER, CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 14, 2003

Citations

309 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
765 N.Y.S.2d 358

Citing Cases

Suffolk Cty. Dep't of Soc. Serv. v. T.-F. (In re C.-A.)

Further, evidence demonstrating that a parent stored drugs within the home in a location that was "readily…

In re Jaylin E

The 21-month-old child was found in an apartment by police investigating marijuana dealing. The officer who…