From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2009
60 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-07138.

March 24, 2009.

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Lubow, J.), dated July 14, 2008, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated February 13, 2008, made upon the appellant's admission, finding that he had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of petit larceny, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months.

Steven Banks, New York, N.Y. (Tamara Steckler and Raymond E. Rogers of counsel), for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York, N.Y. (Larry A. Sonnenshein and Sharyn Rootenberg of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Belen and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court has broad discretion in determining the appropriate disposition, and great deference is given to its determination ( see Matter of Karen M., 58 AD3d 734; Matter of Javed K., 57 AD3d 899; Matter of Ashley D., 55 AD3d 605). The disposition here was not inappropriate.

Under the circumstances of this case, the appellant was not entitled to an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal ( see Matter of Javed K., 57 AD3d 899; Matter of Ashley H., 53 AD3d 578; Matter of Melissa B., 49 AD3d 536; Matter of Oneil D., 35 AD3d 602; Matter of Yasin H., 31 AD3d 638).


Summaries of

In re Michael

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 24, 2009
60 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Michael

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MICHAEL D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 24, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 945 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2360
874 N.Y.S.2d 812

Citing Cases

In re Tremain

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court has broad…

In re Matter of Eunique B

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court has broad…