From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re McDonough

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 12, 1996
559 S.E.2d 832 (S.C. 1996)

Summary

disbarring lawyer for violations including failing to obtain a written copy of contingency fee agreement

Summary of this case from In re Carter

Opinion

No. 24480.

Submitted August 7, 1996.

Decided August 12, 1996.

DISBARRED.

Attorney General Charles Molony Condon and Senior Assistant Attorney General James G. Bogle, Jr., of Columbia, for complainant.

Willaim Jeff Weston, of Greenville, for respondent.


In this attorney grievance matter, respondent has admitted the allegations against him and consents to disbarment. We accept the admission and disbar respondent.

Respondent admits that he violated Rule 1.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 407, SCACR, in failing to obtain a written retainer fee and contingency fee agreement from a client. In addition, he converted approximately $125,000 in client funds held in trust for at least four clients to uses other than those for which they were intended. This conduct constitutes a violation of Rules 1.15 and 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct and Paragraph 5 of the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR. In order to conceal his mishandling of client funds, respondent intentionally misled a client as to the safekeeping of funds and disposition of a case and provided false information to members of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline in this matter, in violation of Rules 1.4 and 8.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

By his conduct, respondent has violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure. Accordingly, we disbar respondent from the practice of law. In addition to the requirements of Paragraphs 37 and 38 of Rule 413, SCACR, no petition for reinstatement shall be accepted until respondent has filed proof that he has made full restitution to all institutions and individuals who have lost money as a result of his fraudulent acts or mishandling of trust funds, to include restitution to the Lawyer's Fund for Client Protection for any payment it may make. Within fifteen days of the date of this opinion, respondent shall file an affidavit with the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Paragraph 30 of Rule 413, SCACR.

DISBARRED.


Summaries of

In re McDonough

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Aug 12, 1996
559 S.E.2d 832 (S.C. 1996)

disbarring lawyer for violations including failing to obtain a written copy of contingency fee agreement

Summary of this case from In re Carter
Case details for

In re McDonough

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of John J. McDonough, III, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Aug 12, 1996

Citations

559 S.E.2d 832 (S.C. 1996)
559 S.E.2d 832

Citing Cases

In the Matter of McDonough

Respondent has been disbarred from the practice of law. In the Matter ofMcDonough, Op. No. 24480 ___ S.C.…

In re Carter

Technically, Carter's argument is correct. SeeRule 1.5(c), RPC, Rule 407, SCACR (“A contingent fee agreement…