From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re McCarthy

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 8, 2011
16 A.3d 351 (N.J. 2011)

Opinion

April 8, 2011.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 10-330, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20-4(f) (default by respondent), that CHRISTOPHER J. McCARTHY of LAKE HOPATCONG, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1989, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(b) (failure to keep client reasonably informed about the status of the matter), RPC 1.15(b) (failure to promptly deliver funds in which the client or third person has an interest), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate in an ethics investigation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTOPHER J. McCARTHY is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.


Summaries of

In re McCarthy

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 8, 2011
16 A.3d 351 (N.J. 2011)
Case details for

In re McCarthy

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OP CHRISTOPHER J. McCARTHY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (ATTORNEY NO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 8, 2011

Citations

16 A.3d 351 (N.J. 2011)
16 A.3d 351

Citing Cases

In re Larkins

At times, the combination of the within violations may still result in an admonition. In In re McCarthy, 205…

In re Felsen

In the Matter of Robert J. Nemshick, DRB 03-364, 03-365, and 03-366 (March 11, 2004) (slip op. at 6). In In…