From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Maurice M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2016
138 A.D.3d 1119 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-27-2016

In the Matter of MAURICE M. (Anonymous), appellant. Andrea Norton, etc., respondent.

Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Claude S. Platton and Mark H. Shawhan of counsel), for respondent.


Steven A. Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Claude S. Platton and Mark H. Shawhan of counsel), for respondent.

In a proceeding for permission to administer medication to a patient without his consent, Maurice M. appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Graham, J.), dated July 3, 2014, which, after a hearing, granted the petition.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The order appealed from expired by its own terms during the pendency of this appeal. Accordingly, this appeal has been rendered academic. Contrary to the appellant's contention, the appeal does not fall within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of Anonymous v. New

York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 70 N.Y.2d 972, 974, 525 N.Y.S.2d 796, 520 N.E.2d 515 ; Matter of Maurice M. [Kinyamu], 125 A.D.3d 660, 999 N.Y.S.2d 751 ; Matter of Carpeah N. [Mid–Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Ctr.], 77 A.D.3d 836, 909 N.Y.S.2d 374 ).

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, DICKERSON and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In re Maurice M.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 27, 2016
138 A.D.3d 1119 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

In re Maurice M.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of MAURICE M. (Anonymous), appellant. Andrea Norton, etc.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 27, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 1119 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
138 A.D.3d 1119
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 3176

Citing Cases

Markowits v. Friedman

In an order dated June 16, 2014, the Supreme Court granted, in part, a motion of various defendants to compel…