From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District
Jul 20, 2021
No. 14-21-00359-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2021)

Opinion

14-21-00359-CR 14-21-00360-CR

07-20-2021

IN RE JAIME DANIEL MARTINEZ, Relator


Do Not Publish - Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 177th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. 1654731, 1654732

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Hassan.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On June 30, 2021, relator Jaime Daniel Martinez filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex.R.App.P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Robert Johnson, presiding judge of the 177th District Court of Harris County, to rule on two motions to reduce bail.

Relator is represented by counsel. A defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation, and, as a consequence, a trial court is free to disregard any pro se motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel. Jenkins v. State, 592 S.W.3d 894, 902 n.47 (Tex. Crim. App. 2018). Moreover, in the absence of a right to hybrid representation, relator's pro se petition for writ of mandamus presents nothing for this court's review. See Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995); Turner v. State, 805 S.W.2d 423, 425 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator's petition for writ of mandamus.


Summaries of

In re Martinez

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District
Jul 20, 2021
No. 14-21-00359-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2021)
Case details for

In re Martinez

Case Details

Full title:IN RE JAIME DANIEL MARTINEZ, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourteenth District

Date published: Jul 20, 2021

Citations

No. 14-21-00359-CR (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2021)