From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lockett

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 6, 2024
23-cv-05338-EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05338-EMC

03-06-2024

IN RE TRIVON N. LOCKETT, Petitioner.


DISMISSAL

EDWARD M. CHEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This action was opened when Petitioner filed an “affidavit.” Docket No. 1. On October 19, 2023, the Clerk told Petitioner that he needed to file a habeas petition or complaint on the Court's form, and that he had 28 days to do so, or the action would be dismissed. Docket No. 2. That same day, the Clerk told Petitioner that he needed either to pay the filing fee for this action or to file a completed and signed Court-approved in forma pauperis application. Docket No. 3. Petitioner was advised that failure comply with either requirement within 28 days would result in dismissal of the action. See Docket Nos. 2-3.

Petitioner has neither filed a petition or complaint, nor has he paid the filing fee or filed an in forma pauperis application. The deadline by which to do so has long since passed. The action is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Lockett

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 6, 2024
23-cv-05338-EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2024)
Case details for

In re Lockett

Case Details

Full title:IN RE TRIVON N. LOCKETT, Petitioner.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 6, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05338-EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 6, 2024)