Opinion
Nos. 26003 to 26009
Decided June 10, 1936.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Building and loan associations — Method of liquidation contested — Counsel's application for fees from associations' assets — Attributes of chancery case — Allowance of fees as costs of administration of trust assets — Augmentation of trust fund benefit to all beneficiaries — Legal or equitable jurisdiction of Common Pleas Court to hear application — Sections 687 to 687-24, General Code — Constitutionality — Due process — Impairment of obligation of shareholder's contract.
APPEALS from the Court of Appeals of Montgomery county.
Mr. W.S. McConnaughey, Mr. Gilbert Bettman and Mr. Raymond S. Powers, for appellants.
Mr. John W. Bricker, attorney general, Mr. Charles H. Jones, Mr. Herbert D. Mills, Mr. Harry P. Jeffrey, Mr. William G. Pickrel, Mr. Harold F. Demann, Mr. Morris P. Cromer, Mr. L.H. Mattern and Mr. Geo. J. Donson, for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that said appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason no debatable constitutional questions are involved in said causes.
Appeals dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., STEPHENSON, WILLIAMS, MATTHIAS, DAY and ZIMMERMAN, JJ., concur.
JONES, J., not participating.