In re LG Electronics, Inc.

Full title: IN RE LG ELECTRONICS, INC.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

469 F. App'x 901 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1248 Reexamination No. 90/008,522

03-14-2012

IN RE LG ELECTRONICS, INC.

ERIC A. SHUMSKY, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were TACY F. FLINT, of Chicago, Illinois, and PETER H. KANG, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel were KENIE HO, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, of Washington, DC, ERIK R. PUKNYS, of Palo Alto, California, and ANDREW C. SONU, of Reston, Virginia. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief wereRAYMOND T. CHEN , Solicitor, and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences.

JUDGMENT

ERIC A. SHUMSKY, Sidley Austin LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were TACY F. FLINT, of Chicago, Illinois, and PETER H. KANG, of Palo Alto, California. Of counsel were KENIE HO, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, of Washington, DC, ERIK R. PUKNYS, of Palo Alto, California, and ANDREW C. SONU, of Reston, Virginia.

WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent & Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief wereRAYMOND T. CHEN , Solicitor, and THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

______________

Jan Horbaly

_________

Clerk