From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Lexar Media, Inc. Securities Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 6, 2005
Case No. C 04-2013 SC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. C 04-2013 SC.

September 6, 2005

Michael K. Yarnoff, Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs, The Mitchell Group.

DEAN S. KRISTY (State Bar No. 157646), KEVIN P. MUCK (State Bar No. 120918), ALICE L. JENSEN (State Bar No. 20332), CHRISTOPHER A. GARCIA (State Bar No. 215184), FENWICK WEST LLP, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendants, Lexar Media, Inc., Eric B. Stang, and Brian T. McGee.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and among plaintiffs and defendants Lexar Media, Inc., Eric B. Stang and Brian T. McGee (collectively, "defendants"), through their undersigned counsel of record, as follows:

WHEREAS, on August 30, 2004, this Court appointed The Mitchell Group as lead plaintiffs and Schiffrin Barroway, LLP as lead counsel and Green Jigarjian, LLP as liaison counsel;

WHEREAS, on October 29, 2004, plaintiffs filed a Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, and in response defendants subsequently filed a motion to dismiss;

WHEREAS, on July 5, 2005, this Court granted defendants' motion to dismiss the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint on the grounds that it failed to state a claim, and gave plaintiffs the opportunity to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days, if they chose to do so;

WHEREAS, plaintiffs have chosen not to file a further amended complaint, and the thirty-day period specified by the Court in which to amend has now expired;

Lead plaintiffs and defendants hereby agree as follows:

1. This action should be dismissed with prejudice; and
2. Each side will bear its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in this action.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re Lexar Media, Inc. Securities Litigation

United States District Court, N.D. California
Sep 6, 2005
Case No. C 04-2013 SC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2005)
Case details for

In re Lexar Media, Inc. Securities Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re LEXAR MEDIA, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. This Document Relates to…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Sep 6, 2005

Citations

Case No. C 04-2013 SC (N.D. Cal. Sep. 6, 2005)

Citing Cases

Kwok Kong v. Fluidigm Corp.

A fall in Fluidigm's stock price does not alone constitute fraud. See Pivotal, 2020 WL 4193384, at *18; In …

In re Pivotal Sec. Litig.

A fall in Pivotal's stock price does not alone constitute fraud. See In re Lexar Media Sec. Litig., 2005 WL…