From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Laura Springs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1996
234 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 23, 1996.

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father Dana Springs appeals from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), dated July 17, 1995, awarding custody of the child of the parties to the mother.

Before: Copertino, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Luciano, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The father's claim of lack of personal jurisdiction was not raised before the Family Court, and therefore has not been preserved for appellate review ( see, Levin v Dorrian, 171 AD2d 415; Sullivan v Murray, 145 AD2d 826). In any event, the attorney's appearance without asserting the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction conferred personal jurisdiction over his client ( see, CPLR 321; Skyline Agency v Ambrose Coppotelli, Inc., 117 AD2d 135, 140; Matter of Rosso v Rosso, 171 AD2d 797, 798).

We have considered the father's remaining contention and find it to be without merit ( see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137).


Summaries of

In re Laura Springs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1996
234 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

In re Laura Springs

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LAURA SPRINGS, Appellant, v. DANA SPRINGS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 579

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Taina M

Family Court denied the motion in its entirety, and this appeal ensued. Initially, we note that counsel's…

Dove v. Rose

The further contention of the mother that she did not have notice of the allegations in the amended petition…