From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Block

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 14, 2014
84 A.3d 262 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-14

In the Matter of Adam Kenneth BLOCK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 046571993).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–131, concluding on the record certified to the Board pursuant to Rule 1:20–4(f)(default by respondent), that ADAM KENNETH BLOCK of RUTHERFORD, who was admitted to the bar of. this State in 1993, should be censured for violating RPC 5.5(a) (practicing law while ineligible) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ADAM KENNETH BLOCK is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Block

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 14, 2014
84 A.3d 262 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Block

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Adam Kenneth BLOCK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Feb 14, 2014

Citations

84 A.3d 262 (N.J. 2014)
217 N.J. 21

Citing Cases

In re Block

On February 14, 2014, respondent was censured for the same violation, again, on a default basis. In re Block,…

In re Block

On February 14, 2014, respondent was censured for the same violation, again, on a default basis. In re Block,…