From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kleinfeld

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 22, 1971
58 N.J. 217 (N.J. 1971)

Opinion

Argued March 23, 1971 —

Decided April 22, 1971.

Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Sr. argued the cause for the Hudson County Ethics Committee.

Mr. Martin D. Moroney argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Kleinberg, Moroney, Masterson Schachter, attorneys).


Respondent was charged in a federal information with wilfully and knowingly attempting to evade and defeat a large part of income taxes due for the years 1961 through 1963. Respondent pleaded nolo contendere to one count of the information; a fine of $1,000 was imposed. Thereupon, the remaining counts of the information were dismissed. Respondent's plea of nolo contendere is tantamount for present purposes to a plea of guilty and his conviction subjects him to disciplinary action. After a hearing, the Hudson County Ethics Committee filed a presentment and we thereafter issued an order to show cause.

We have weighed all the mitigating considerations advanced by respondent. Under the circumstances, the appropriate discipline is the suspension from the practice of law for six months and until further order of this Court.

It is so ordered.

For suspension for six months — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

Opposed — None.


Summaries of

In re Kleinfeld

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Apr 22, 1971
58 N.J. 217 (N.J. 1971)
Case details for

In re Kleinfeld

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF MAX KLEINFELD, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 22, 1971

Citations

58 N.J. 217 (N.J. 1971)
276 A.2d 376

Citing Cases

Matter of Kleinfeld

It is Ordered that Max Kleinfeld of Union City is suspended for a period of six months and until further…

In re Rubin

See, e.g., In re Kleinfield, 58 N.J. 217 (1971) (six-month suspension following a plea of nolo contendere to…