From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Klein

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 11, 2012
209 N.J. 234 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-01-11

In the Matter of Michael Scott KLEIN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 045221994).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–137, concluding that as a matter of final discipline pursuant to Rule 1:20–13(c), MICHAEL SCOTT KLEIN of WARRINGTON, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years based on respondent's plea of guilty in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201 and to criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, conduct that in New Jersey violates RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that adversely reflects on the attorney's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MICHAEL SCOTT KLEIN is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20–20 dealing with suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 1:20–20(c), respondent's failure to comply with the Affidavit of Compliance requirement of Rule 1:20–20(b)(15) may (1) preclude the Disciplinary Review Board from considering respondent's petition for reinstatement for a period of up to six months from the date respondent files proof of compliance; (2) be found to constitute a violation of RPC 8.1(b) and RPC 8.4(c); and (3) provide a basis for an action for contempt pursuant to Rule 1:10–2; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Klein

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jan 11, 2012
209 N.J. 234 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Klein

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Michael Scott KLEIN, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

209 N.J. 234 (N.J. 2012)
37 A.3d 449

Citing Cases

In re Bozeman

Michael S. Klein, an attorney employed in Bagdis' office, was suspended by the Court for three years as a…

In re Rubin

ars, and was fined $1,000); In re Becker, 69 N.J. 118 (1976) (two-year suspension for attorney who pleaded…