Opinion
1727-1727A
October 3, 2002.
Orders, Family Court, New York County (Clark Richardson, J.), entered on or about October 31, 1997, finding, after a hearing, that respondent mother's children were neglected within the meaning of Family Court Act § 1012, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
SUSAN CLEMENT, for Khelia B.
DENNIS HOUDEK, for respondent-appellant.
JOHN HOGROGIAN, for petitioner-respondent.
Before: Williams, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez, JJ.
Family Court's neglect findings against respondent in these child protective proceedings pursuant to article 10 of the Family Court Act were based on the requisite preponderance of the evidence (see Family Court Act § 1046[b][I]). The credible testimony established that respondent failed over some eight months to treat a serious rash contracted by her infant daughter in a medically appropriate way. Although the rash had previously been treated successfully with prescribed ointments, respondent, on the occasion of the outbreak here at issue, elected instead to apply a home remedy of vinegar and pennies, which caused the rash to ulcerate, thus impairing the child's health (see Matter of Faridah W., 180 A.D.2d 451, 452, appeal denied 80 N.Y.2d 751) and warranting a finding of derivative neglect with respect to the immediately affected child's sibling (see Matter of Jessica R., 230 A.D.2d 108, 112). The finding of neglect against respondent was additionally warranted by the proof establishing that she suffers from mental illness, i.e. bipolar disorder, that she refuses to be treated for the disorder, and that the disorder, untreated, has left her with significantly impaired judgment respecting, inter alia, the medical needs of her children (see Matter of Lisa M., 261 A.D.2d 241).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.