From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kassa

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Jul 24, 1996
198 B.R. 790 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1996)

Summary

determining that $16.82 per hour is reasonable compensation for petition preparers

Summary of this case from In re Moran

Opinion

Bankruptcy No. 95-0941 PL JMM.

July 24, 1996.

James L. Robinson, Jr., Tucson, AZ, for debtors.


MEMORANDUM DECISION RE: REQUEST FOR RETURN OF FEES PAID TO A DOCUMENT PREPARER


Before the Court is the debtors' Motion for Return of Funds paid to a document preparation service. (Dkt. 49). The Court has reviewed the entire file, including the Response filed by Dan Fore and Deanna Fore, the document preparers. The matter was submitted for decision on the files and pleadings and papers contained therein. The debtors are now represented by James L. Robinson, Jr. The Fores, the subjects of the request for return of funds, are representing themselves.

FACTS

1. The debtors filed a chapter 13 bankruptcy on April 27, 1995.

2. The pleadings filed by the debtors, which were apparently prepared with the assistance of Mr. and Mrs. Fore, are:

a. Voluntary Petition.

b. Statement of Intention.

c. Notice to Consumer Debtors (concerning various available options).

d. Disclosure of Compensation of Bankruptcy Petition Preparer, reflecting payment of a $500 fee.

e. Schedules and Statement of Affairs.

f. Amendments to Schedules.

g. Income and Expense Statements (Schedules I and J).

h. A plan proposal.

i. Statement of Financial Affairs.

3. On August 23, 1995, the debtors retained attorney James L. Robinson, Jr. to assist them in concluding their chapter 13 plan. The plan had drawn objections from Ford Motor Credit Company (Dkt. 14) and the Trustee (Dkt. 20).

LEGAL DISCUSSION

The sole issue in this case is to determine whether the $500 fee paid to the document preparers was reasonable. The document preparers have filed affidavits and pleadings stating that they gave no legal advice. Instead, in essence, they claim that they merely gathered and organized information presented by the debtors, and transcribed it as typists.

The Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 110(h) provides that the Court may review the fee charged, and order the return of any sum found to be in excess of the value of the services rendered for the documents prepared. A motion for the return of excess funds paid may be filed by the debtor, the trustee, a creditor or the United States Trustee. § 110(h)(3).

Document preparers are not attorneys. Mr. Fore, however, is a certified paralegal. The task to organize information and type it, is something that a trained legal secretary can do, no more and no less. A document preparer may not give legal advice. Neither can a paralegal. Consequently, a document preparer should be compensated in the same fashion, and in the same amount as a legal secretary.

A good legal secretary makes between $30,000 and $35,000 per year. Assuming the $35,000 figure, the Kassas' bankruptcy pleadings and interview would take about 12 hours to prepare (incidentally, the Fores supplied no time slips or breakdown of their time spent). This further breaks down to an hourly rate of $16.82. ($35,000 divided by 52 = $673.07 per week divided by 40 hours per week = $16.82). That figure, multiplied by the 12 hours which this Court estimates it would take to complete these schedules, plan and interviews, equals a fee of $201.92.

Therefore, the Fores are authorized to retain $201.92, and to remit, within 10 days, the balance of the $500 fee, or $298.08, to Margo Itule, the chapter 13 trustee, to be utilized in the debtors' chapter 13 case.


Summaries of

In re Kassa

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Jul 24, 1996
198 B.R. 790 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1996)

determining that $16.82 per hour is reasonable compensation for petition preparers

Summary of this case from In re Moran

allowing $16.82 per hour, with allowed fee of $201.92, compared to $500.00 charged

Summary of this case from In re Alexander
Case details for

In re Kassa

Case Details

Full title:In re Orrin S. KASSA and Gail S. Kassa, Debtors

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jul 24, 1996

Citations

198 B.R. 790 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 1996)

Citing Cases

In re Hill

Plotnick cited two Arizona bankruptcy court decisions: In re Thueson, No. 4:08–bk–10121, 2009 WL 1076888…

In re Thueson

As this court noted in the In re Kassa case, written almost thirteen years ago, these tasks are "something…