From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kaplan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 6, 2011
29 A.3d 266 (D.C. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11–BG–636.

2011-10-6

In re Michael A. KAPLAN, Respondent.


Bar Registration No. 947499, BDN: 144–11.BEFORE: OBERLY, Associate Judge, STEADMAN and KING, Senior Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified copy of an order of the Supreme Court of New Jersey suspending respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction for a period of one year, all stayed in favor of a one-year probationary period, this court's June 14, 2011 order directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file a response to this court's order, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it is

ORDERED that, Michael A. Kaplan, Esquire, is hereby suspended for a period of one year, all stayed in favor of a one-year probationary period subject to the conditions imposed in New Jersey.


Summaries of

In re Kaplan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Oct 6, 2011
29 A.3d 266 (D.C. 2011)
Case details for

In re Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:In re Michael A. KAPLAN, Respondent

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 6, 2011

Citations

29 A.3d 266 (D.C. 2011)

Citing Cases

O'Laughlin v. Helvering

And in such cases the fact that the bankrupt is not contradicted in his main statement that he no longer has…

Mackall-Paine Veneer Co. v. Vancouver Etc. Co.

"Authorities are also cited to the effect that the bankruptcy court may by a like proceeding take away from a…