From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re J.R.V.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 27, 2012
365 N.C. 416 (N.C. 2012)

Opinion

No. 235PA11.

2012-01-27

In the Matter of J.R.V.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Richard Croutharmel, for juvenile-appellant.


On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A–31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ––– N.C.App. ––––, 710 S.E.2d 411 (2011), affirming an adjudication order entered on 31 March 2010 by Judge James A. Grogan in District Court, Rockingham County, and a disposition order entered on 29 June 2010 by Judge William F. Southern in District Court, Stokes County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 9 January 2012. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by LaToya B. Powell, Assistant Attorney General, for the State. Richard Croutharmel, for juvenile-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.


Summaries of

In re J.R.V.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jan 27, 2012
365 N.C. 416 (N.C. 2012)
Case details for

In re J.R.V.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of J.R.V.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Jan 27, 2012

Citations

365 N.C. 416 (N.C. 2012)
720 S.E.2d 387

Citing Cases

In re Z.T.W.

effect that we should make a generalized analysis of the extent to which the manner in which Juvenile's…

In re S.C.

"Our courts have consistently recognized that the State has a greater duty to protect the rights of a…