From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2015
2:13-cv-02414-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)

Opinion

          Gary W. Kubek (pro hac vice), Johanna Skrzypczyk (pro hac vice), DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP, New York, New York, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, CHRISTOPHER J. BANKS, Franklin Brockway Gowdy, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Nominal Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Defendants James Dimon, William B. Harrison, Jr., and Robert I. Lipp.

          COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP, Brian M. Schnaar (as authorized on July 29, 2015) Mark C. Molumphy, Joseph W. Cotchett, Elizabeth T. Tran, Burlingame, CA, Lead Counsel and Attorneys for Plaintiff Ronald A. Harris, derivatively on behalf of JPMorgan Chase & Co.


          STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE HEARING RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         STIPULATION

         WHEREAS, on July 17, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel responses from Defendant JPMorgan Chase & Co. ("JPMorgan") and inside director Defendants James Dimon and William B. Harrison Jr. (collectively, the "Defendants"), see ECF No. 96, to document requests that were propounded pursuant to the Court's May 5, 2015 Order approving jurisdictional discovery, see ECF No. 92;

         WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court's July 17, 2015 Minute Order, the hearing on the motion to compel was scheduled for August 5, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.;

         WHEREAS, Defendants' counsel is not available to attend the hearing at the noticed date and time;

         WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants have met and conferred and agreed, if acceptable to the Court, to continue the hearing for the convenience of counsel to August 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.;

         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, that the hearing on Plaintiffs' pending motion to compel shall be continued to August 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         [PROPOSED] ORDER

         The hearing on Plaintiffs' pending motion to compel (ECF No. 96) is continued to August 12, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative Litigation

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 30, 2015
2:13-cv-02414-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)
Case details for

In re JPMorgan Chase Derivative Litigation

Case Details

Full title:In re JPMORGAN CHASE DERIVATIVE LITIGATION. This Document Relates To: All…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 30, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-02414-KJM-EFB (E.D. Cal. Jul. 30, 2015)