From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jordan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Mar 2, 2017
Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-313 (BJR) (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2017)

Summary

holding that cell searches and resulting confiscation of property satisfy adverse action element when motivated by retaliatory means

Summary of this case from Nichols v. Phillips

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-313 (BJR)

03-02-2017

DAVID V. JORDAN , Plaintiff, v. UNIT MANAGER BERTOLINI, et al. Defendants.


ORDER ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having considered the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter, and the balance of record, HEREBY ORDERS:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

(3) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 2nd day of March, 2017.

/s/_________

BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

In re Jordan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE
Mar 2, 2017
Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-313 (BJR) (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2017)

holding that cell searches and resulting confiscation of property satisfy adverse action element when motivated by retaliatory means

Summary of this case from Nichols v. Phillips
Case details for

In re Jordan

Case Details

Full title:DAVID V. JORDAN , Plaintiff, v. UNIT MANAGER BERTOLINI, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AT ERIE

Date published: Mar 2, 2017

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-313 (BJR) (W.D. Pa. Mar. 2, 2017)

Citing Cases

Nichols v. Phillips

Humphrey v. Sec'y Pennsylvania Dep't of Corr., No. 15-3250, 2017 WL 4736687, at *2 (3d Cir. Oct. 20, 2017)…