From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jeff v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 500558.

January 11, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which directed that petitioner be placed in administrative segregation.

Jeff Obregon, Wallkill, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Patrick Barnett-Mulligan of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Mugglin and Kane, JJ.


While incarcerated at Shawangunk Correctional Facility in Ulster County, petitioner was identified as the subject of a multijurisdiction investigation into a drug-trafficking ring and, as a result, a recommendation was made to place him into administrative segregation. Following a hearing, it was determined that petitioner's presence in the general population would jeopardize the safety and security of the facility and he was placed into administrative segregation. The determination was upheld on administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. At the hearing, the deputy inspector general in charge of the narcotics unit for the Department of Correctional Services Inspector General's office testified that petitioner and several members of his family were the subjects of an ongoing investigation of a large-scale drug-trafficking operation. The deputy inspector general also testified that members of petitioner's family had been arrested and indicted as a result of the investigation and that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Drug Enforcement Administration indicated that criminal charges against petitioner were likewise forthcoming. This testimony provided substantial evidence to support the determination that administrative segregation of petitioner was warranted in that petitioner's presence in the general prison population would jeopardize the safety and security of the other inmates and staff and would be contrary to the orderly operation of the facility ( see 7 NYCRR 301.4 [b]; Matter of Mauleon v Goord, 29 AD3d 1241, 1242; Matter of Burr v Goord, 17 AD3d 751, 752-753).

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re Jeff v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 11, 2007
36 A.D.3d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

In re Jeff v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JEFF OBREGON, Petitioner, v. GLENN S. GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 11, 2007

Citations

36 A.D.3d 1034 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 184
826 N.Y.S.2d 524

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Selsky

In that regard, we note that "`[i]n the volatile atmosphere of a prison, an inmate easily may constitute an…

Dumpson v. Fischer

Moreover, petitioner has an extensive prison disciplinary record consisting of numerous tier II and tier III…