From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re James Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 508760.

November 18, 2010.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

James Jenkins, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Rose, Malone Jr. and McCarthy, JJ.


Petitioner was charged in two misbehavior reports with a number of prison disciplinary rule violations after he refused a correction officer's directive to turn over a state-issued shirt that had been altered, attempted to strike that officer and, when he was escorted away from the area by another correction officer for a pat frisk, refused that officer's directives and became combative. A tier III disciplinary hearing was conducted on the charges contained in both reports. At the conclusion of the hearing, petitioner was found guilty of two charges of engaging in violent conduct, two charges of refusing a direct order, refusing a search or frisk and attempting to assault staff. The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior reports, together with the testimony of the correction officers who authored them, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of McLaughlin v Fischer, 69 AD3d 1071, 1072; Matter of Bridgeforth v Fischer, 69 AD3d 1068, 1068-1069). Petitioner's contrary testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Gaines v Fischer, 67 AD3d 1080, 1081; Matter of Sanders v Chord, 47 AD3d 987, 988). His remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

In re James Jenkins

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 18, 2010
78 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

In re James Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMES JENKINS, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2010

Citations

78 A.D.3d 1385 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8400
910 N.Y.S.2d 922

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Fischer

The determination was affirmed on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. The…

Brisman v. Fischer

ether with the testimony adduced at the hearing and the confidential information considered by the Hearing…