From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jamal Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 5, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1112 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 506890.

November 5, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Jamal Butler, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.


Following a fight involving 17 inmates in the prison yard, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with fighting, engaging in violent conduct and failing to report an injury after he was discovered with lacerations to his left forearm and the right side of his head. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. His administrative appeal was unsuccessful and petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

Initially, respondent concedes and we agree that the record does not support the charges against petitioner for fighting and engaging in violent conduct and, thus, the determination must be annulled to that extent with all references thereto expunged from petitioner's institutional record ( see Matter of Covington v Smith, 63 AD3d 1453, lv denied 13 NY3d ", 2009 NY Slip Op 86469 [2009]; Matter of Daum v Goord, 27 AD3d 858, 858-859). Inasmuch as no loss of good time was imposed, the matter need not be remitted to respondent to redetermine the penalty ( see Matter of Covington v Smith, 63 AD3d at 1453; Matter of Daum v Goord, 27 AD3d at 859).

However, with regard to the charge of failing to report an injury, we find that the detailed misbehavior report, hearing testimony, pictures of petitioner's injuries and his admissions during the hearing provide substantial evidence to support this finding of guilt ( see Matter of Pertillar v Fischer, 64 AD3d 1029, 1030; Matter of Davis v Fischer, 64 AD3d 847, 848, lv denied 13 NY3d 709).

Adjudged that the determination is modified, without costs, by annulling so much thereof as found petitioner guilty of fighting and engaging in violent conduct; petition granted to that extent and respondent is directed to expunge all references thereto from petitioner's institutional record; and, as so modified, confirmed.


Summaries of

In re Jamal Butler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 5, 2009
67 A.D.3d 1112 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

In re Jamal Butler

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JAMAL BUTLER, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 5, 2009

Citations

67 A.D.3d 1112 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 7916
889 N.Y.S.2d 259

Citing Cases

In re Jack Davis

We confirm. The misbehavior report, testimony of the correction officer who authored the report and pictures…

In re Covington

We confirm. The misbehavior report and the hearing testimony, including petitioner's admission that he did…