From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Jaffe

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 18, 2012
211 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2012)

Opinion

2012-07-18

In the Matter of Mark H. JAFFE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 029991988).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11–433, concluding that MARK H. JAFFE of PRINCETON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1988, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 3.3(a)(1) (knowingly making a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal), RPC 3.3(a)(5) (failure to disclose to a tribunal a material fact knowing that the omission is reasonably certain to mislead the tribunal), and RPC 3.3(d)(in an ex parte proceeding, a lawyer shall inform the tribunal of all relevant facts known to the lawyer that should be disclosed to permit the tribunal to make an informed decision, whether or not the facts are adverse), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that MARK H. JAFFE is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Jaffe

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Jul 18, 2012
211 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2012)
Case details for

In re Jaffe

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Mark H. JAFFE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

211 N.J. 1 (N.J. 2012)
47 A.3d 668

Citing Cases

In re Saluti

Conduct involving lack of candor to a tribunal has resulted in a wide range of discipline. See, e.g., In the…

In re Jaffe

In re Jaffe, 211 N.J. 1 (2012). In 2017, respondent received a censure for his misconduct in two…