From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Estate of Aguilar

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 20, 2016
No. 04-16-00250-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2016)

Opinion

No. 04-16-00250-CV

07-20-2016

IN THE ESTATE OF ALVILDA MAE AGUILAR, Deceased


MEMORANDUM OPINION

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas
Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802
Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Anthony C. Aguilar and Michael A. Aguilar sought to appeal the probate court's January 27, 2016 Order Approving Final Account. After reviewing the record and appellant's arguments, we concluded the trial court's January 27, 2016 order was not final and that this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. See Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); In re Estate of Scott, 364 S.W.3d 926, 927 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2012, no pet.); Bozeman v. Kornblit, 232 S.W.3d 261 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.).

We conditionally granted the Aguilars' request to construe their notice of appeal as a petition for a writ of mandamus and ordered them to file a petition complying with rule 52.3 of the Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure by July 7, 2016. We advised appellants that failure to comply with our order would result in this proceeding being dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Aguilars have not filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, but filed instead an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. We therefore dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

In re Estate of Aguilar

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Jul 20, 2016
No. 04-16-00250-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2016)
Case details for

In re Estate of Aguilar

Case Details

Full title:IN THE ESTATE OF ALVILDA MAE AGUILAR, Deceased

Court:Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Date published: Jul 20, 2016

Citations

No. 04-16-00250-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2016)

Citing Cases

In re Estate of Froehle

Because the "Order Approving Account for Final Settlement" is not a final, appealable order, we dismiss this…